<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://expeditio.kriegsmarinearchiv.at/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3ASKNIris0500764</id>
	<title>User:SKNIris0500764 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://expeditio.kriegsmarinearchiv.at/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=User%3ASKNIris0500764"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://expeditio.kriegsmarinearchiv.at/index.php?title=User:SKNIris0500764&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-27T12:56:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.11</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://expeditio.kriegsmarinearchiv.at/index.php?title=User:SKNIris0500764&amp;diff=157107&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>SKNIris0500764: Created page with &quot;Every weekend, thousands of football tips land in your feed. Some come from tipsters with confident screenshots, some from statistical models, some from the bookmakers&#039; own odds. Almost none come with a straight answer to the obvious question: how often are they right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The honest answer is that football is hard to predict, and the best predictions are usually less accurate than people expect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why football is so hard to call&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Football is a low-scoring...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://expeditio.kriegsmarinearchiv.at/index.php?title=User:SKNIris0500764&amp;diff=157107&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-10T02:32:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Every weekend, thousands of football tips land in your feed. Some come from tipsters with confident screenshots, some from statistical models, some from the bookmakers&amp;#039; own odds. Almost none come with a straight answer to the obvious question: how often are they right?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The honest answer is that football is hard to predict, and the best predictions are usually less accurate than people expect.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Why football is so hard to call&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Football is a low-scoring...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Every weekend, thousands of football tips land in your feed. Some come from tipsters with confident screenshots, some from statistical models, some from the bookmakers&amp;#039; own odds. Almost none come with a straight answer to the obvious question: how often are they right?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The honest answer is that football is hard to predict, and the best predictions are usually less accurate than people expect.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Why football is so hard to call&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Football is a low-scoring sport. A single deflection, red card or [https://stockhouse.com/search?searchtext=goalkeeper goalkeeper] error can decide a match that one side dominated. In basketball, the better team almost always wins. In football, upsets are built into the sport.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That means even a strong model will often be &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; on individual matches. A team given a 70% chance of winning will still fail to win roughly three times in ten. That isn&amp;#039;t a bad prediction, it&amp;#039;s what 70% means.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Hit rate is the wrong measure&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Most tipsters advertise a win percentage, but it&amp;#039;s easy to game. Pick only heavy favourites and your hit rate looks excellent while your tips offer no real value. Pick a run of 1.10 odds shots and you could be right nine times in ten and still lose money.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;My web site - [https://probapredict.app/ probapredict]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>SKNIris0500764</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>